Saturday, October 14, 2017

Harvey Weinstein expelled from the Academy

Napoléon à Sainte-Hélène: François-Joseph Sandmann (1820)

EBL: George Clooney accused of covering for pussy grabbers, The Weinstein Saga Continues, The Corrupt Ephors of the Academy decide Harvey Weinstein's fate, What's in Jimmy Kimmel's pants (and what is not), Hilarie Burton and Gropey Ben Affleck, Harvey Flees for Europe, Harvey's Wife Flees Him, The Harvey Girls, Matt Damon Pimping for Harvey Weinstein?, Haley Atwell and Harvey Weinstein, Roman Harvey-Day and Harvey Weinstein and the NYT go to war, and no, not these Harvey Girls

Instapundit: Hollywood = ProstitutionWeinstein is the PatriarchyGlenn Reynolds: Harvey Weinstein won't wash away the sins of HollywoodIf men don't act like gentlemen and women like ladies, it's Harvey Weinsteins all the way downPodhoretz on Hobbes and Harvey Weinstein, Flashback to men behaving badlyMorally corrupt industry unsure how it became morally corruptRoger Simon: Why now for Harvey?Call me when Roman Polanski gets the boot, If she's breathing, she's lying, Weinstein octopus, How much money did Weinstein give the Clintons?

American Thinker: Take back your diamonds, take back your pearls, what makes you think I was one of Weinstein's girls?

Victory Girls: Hillary Clinton, Bowe Bergdahl, Harvey Weinstein and a Baboon's Backside

Don Surber: How Clinton enabled Weinstein and Disney is a Weinstein-ESPN mess

Dowd/NYT: Hollywood's oldest horror story

A bit of Poe is in order for Harvey's fall: 

THR: Industry "gleeful" about Harvey's expulsion (because many of them want to divert attention from themselves)

Wombat: Mark Steyn: Crisis Of The Elites, also, Do As The Romans Do, Louder With Crowder: Before Jimmy Kimmel Lectured America On Ethics, He Asked Women To Grab His Crotch


  1. Let me know when they do it to Darryl Zanuck, Harry Cohn, Kirk Douglas, Bill Holden...

  2. I guess I understand what that means going forward, but what does it mean about the past? So he can't win more Oscars, but what were the chances of that happening? Oh, not make movies? Again, would he make them anymore anyway? If he did, it would only be after being exonerated for all these allegations, which is possible but not to likely. Still wouldn't that have been the proper thing to do? I know we are supposed to hear all victims, but that means guilty now? Well yeah, this is the left, but I personally believe its a bit more.

    They know he's guilty because they were complicit. They are hoping to distance themselves before anyone looks past and sees what Ed mentions.

    I think they are too late.


I had to stop Anonymous comments due to spam. But I welcome all legitimate comments. Thanks.