Showing posts with label Instalanche. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Instalanche. Show all posts

Thursday, February 18, 2016

What happens if Hillary loses the Nevada Caucuses? Breaking: More bad news for Hillary, the only candidate she could beat may be dropping out...


DRUDGE has all sorts of links

Hillary could lose Nevada. If Bernie manages to win or even come close, what happens with Democrat Delegates?  With a dubious "win" in Iowa and a blow out defeat in New Hampshire, Hillary is now leading Sanders 10:1 on delegates?  Why? Welcome to the Byzantine back room shenanigans of the Democrat Party.  

But what if Sanders keeps winning primaries? Even Democrats have to acknowledge reality. She is getting party backing mostly under the belief she is more electable than Sanders. Eventually things will reach a tipping point when even Democrats have to accept that no amount of prompting or rigging by the DNC will save her in the general election (the Instapundit link below shows Hillary's weakness there). 

Democrats will figure out that they have a better shot with an old Democrat Socialist, with poor social skills, and hair growing out of the candidate's ears. Hey, that phrasing is a bit ambiguous. That sentence could very well describe Hillary Clinton or Joe Biden!


Twitchy had this gem: 



Mark Steyn: The Realm of Manners
AoSHQ/Open Blogger: Thursday News Dump
Leon Wolf/RedState: Talking about Losers (time to drop out Jeb)
Instapundit: Hillary manages to win Nevada (disaster diverted for Democrats for now), Thank you Ed for the Instalanche, Flailing, Hillary about to repeat 2008 (she's not Bill) and General Election Polls

Breaking:

Erick Erickson: Jeb's campaign is broke

Bad News for Hillary, Jeb is the only candidate she could beat
Update: F-bombs fly as Jeb Bush denies!



Wombat: Don Surber: Amy Lindsay explains why Hillary Clinton is in trouble
AoSHQ: No one saw this coming
Salon:  Hillary Can't Win, Democrats Need To Accept That

Mark Steyn: Bush Wacked

Tuesday, September 9, 2014

Fighting Radical Feminism one piece of sushi at a time!


I suspect it is mostly jealousy: Lesbians (and most feminists are lesbians) are fattest demographic and while they pretend they don't care how they look many of them are freaked out by attractive women.

Update: Inspiration for this post goes to Proof Positive with his Nyotaimori comment!
Domo Arigato, Mr. Proof-boto!

And Domo Arigato, Instapundit too!

Portia di Rossi is not over weight (or a typical lesbian) 
But she is also a vegan so no fish sushi for her

But women with fish are almost always attractive:


Feminists need to lighten up and stop projecting their poor self-esteem on attractive women

Rad Fems, there are nude beaches in Vancouver for you…




Feminists could learn to love it if they tried…





Update:
Confessions of a Naked Sushi Model

Friday, October 25, 2013

Paleo blogger Glenn Reynolds meets paleo diet author Nell Stephenson




Nell Stephenson qualifies for Rule 5.  And my use of "paleo" is intended as a good thing.


Rule 5 Rubycon

How Cro Magon paleo ancestors likely looked...healthy!

Of course the wheel and woven cloth did not exist during most (if not all) of the Pleistocene, 
so you can use your imagination and remove them from this photograph...

Embrace the paleo diet...

Man cannot live on bread alone.

Saturday, July 13, 2013

Downfall of Angela Corey (the Zimmerman verdict comes in)

Update:
Democrats intend to stir the pot and use this to fire up their base.  It is not over for George Zimmerman...
Crump fired up this case and has already gotten a big settlement out of Zimmerman's HOA. For him it is about money.
Instapundit and Roger Simon at Pajamas Media had this...
ROGER SIMON: Obama Big Loser In Zimmerman Trial. “By injecting himself in a minor Florida criminal case by implying Martin could be his son, the president of the United States — a former law professor, of all things — disgraced himself and his office, made a mockery of our legal system and exacerbated racial tensions in our country, making them worse than they have been in years. This is the work of a reactionary, someone who consciously/unconsciously wants to push our nation back to the 1950s.” Have you noticed that there seems to be a lot of fifties-nostalgia among today’s left? Forward — to the past!Plus: “Of course, they aren’t the only ones. Almost everyone is a victim in in this case that should never have been tried. George Zimmerman will never live a normal life. The American public has been polarized with emotions stirred up for absolutely no reason. Racism is essentially manufactured, as if it were a commodity.” For some political organizations, it’s a necessity.And: “Congratulations to the jury for not acceding to this tremendous pressure.” Yes, they stood up to the organized pressure better than Chief Justice Roberts.Related: It’s the 50′s again Black Man Acquitted of Murder Powerful & Influential outraged!Posted at 10:48 am by Glenn Reynolds    
Will Eric Holder double down on the Angela Corey strategy?     
Donald Douglas and Roger Simon suggested Angela Corey should be disbarred, but his Roger Simon's wife suggested maybe she should take Janet Napolitano's job at Homeland Security!
(corrected, oops)
Protein Wisdom:  Congratulations to the jury for restoring a modicum of faith in the rule of law...
Legal Insurrection: Dershowitz v. Corey
Legal Insurrection: As he shakes his head in disbelief... (come on Kirsten, you are better than that)
Legal Insurrection: Angela Corey's history of going after her critics (she is vindictive)
JULY 14, 2013

YOU KNEW IT WAS COMING: Hitler learns that Angela Corey lost.

Wednesday, July 18, 2012

Friday, July 6, 2012

Here is one of the posts that Dan Valenti was ordered to take down regarding Meredith Nilan by the Massachusetts state district court...

William G. Ryan at his blog re-posted the story Dan Valenti was ordered to take down. Whether it is true or not remains to be seen (and since Meredith Nilan did plead guilty to the basic charge, much of it is obviously true), but there is nothing improper about the post below.  Ask yourself, why would any judge order this post be deleted?


Here is a refresher of free speech as listed in the U.S. Constitution and the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.  First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution
Article XVI. [The liberty of the press is essential to the security of freedom in a state: it ought not, therefore, to be restrained in this commonwealth.] [See Amendments, Art. XLVIII, The Initiative, II, sec. 2.] [Annulled and superseded by Amendments, Art. LXXVII.  Article XVI. The liberty of the press is essential to the security of freedom in a state: it ought not, therefore, to be restrained in this commonwealth. The right of free speech shall not be abridged.  Constitution of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts 

AN UNEXPURGATED RECREATION OF THE MEREDITH NILAN CASE, AND WHY IT STANDS AS AN INDICTMENT OF THE PITTSFIELD COURTS

By DAN VALENTI

PLANET VALENTI News and Commentary
(FORTRESS OF SOLITUDE, MONDAY, JAN. 23, 2012) — We The People have not rested our case in the Meredith-Cliff Nilan Hit-and-Run travesty. To be clear, the travesty lies the handling of the case, from the get go. If the driver is one of the Kapanskis, there’s hell to pay. If the driver is the daughter of one of the most arrogant and obnoxiously self-righteous of the GOBs, which is saying a heap, she skates.
We The People cannot let this finding stand without a thorough, honest, and objective investigation. Until then, the Pittsfield courts stand indicted on a charges of obstruction, malfeasance, and manipulation.
A SUMMATION OF A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE — This happened, Then That Happened
From all available evidence, here’s the play-by-play:
* It is the night of Dec. 8, around 8:15 p.m. Meredith Nilan, from all the available evidence and according to the police, has just finished partying at a BYP gathering famous not for “networking” but from drinking to excess. Not one BYP to date has publicly testified to what they saw of Nilan’s behavior that night. Almost all won’t even admit they were there. The photographic evidence, however, tell us some of the roster who were there at the Great Barrington hot spot. One attendee, who will not allow his or her name to be used, says Meredith Nilan drank heavily at the party. This is not been confirmed and must be considered hearsay, which, we remind our readers, doesn’t necessarily mean the information is not true. We must ask why the BYPs are so afraid to say anything. Could it be they know if they come out and tell the truth, the GOBs will punish them and their careers, locally, will be over? Many of the BYPs are, remember, professional and social climbers looking to get in on the gravy train.
* Meredith Nilan is driving on Winesap Road, near her home. A pedestrian is walk-jogging his dog on the opposite side of the road, heading in the same direction.
* Nilan’s car swerves. Clearly, she has lost control. Why? Too much alcohol? Texting? Yakking on a cell phone. Falling asleep at the wheel? Daydreaming? All of these? None of these? The vehicle, owned by and registered to her daddy, Clifford Nilan,  crosses lanes crosses lanes and slams into the pedestrian.
* The impact is so great that, as revealed by the photographic evidence, the front grille is torn off, the hood is dented, and a fully delineated hole is created in the windshield just to the right of the driver. The hole is caused by the head of victim Peter Moore as it smashes through the safety glass. Incidentally, THE PLANET has seen a muscular wise guy take a baseball bat to a car windshield in anger. He needed several whacks with all his strength to even create hazing. More whacks produced a spider’s web cracking. Still more whacks finally broke through the glass. Try it today on your own vehicle. You’ll see how tough it is to break the glass, and yet — and yet — the force of the impact of Nilan’s vehicle and Moore’s head produced a hole in the windshield as if it came from a punch press. Excessive speed, perhaps?
THE EVIDENCE SUGGESTS: There’s No REASONABLE Way Meredith Nilan’s Story Can be Taken as Credible
* After surveying the damage to the vehicle, in photos that officials tried to suppress and that were first published by THE PLANET, there is no way one can reasonably believe the driver did not know she had hit a human being — not a “dog or a deer.”
* The driver does not stop, notify police, and wait for the police to arrive, as the law requires, despite the fact that a man is almost killed.
* The incident is hidden for almost a month, although THE PLANET first got wind of it maybe a week after it happened. Our first notice came in an e-mail from one of our spies. We made discreet inquiries. Miracle: Nobody knew, heard, saw, and was saying nothing. Nonetheless, we got enough of a confirmation to tell us there was truth to what we heard.Something had happened.
* The incident finally breaks. We learn that Cliffy Nilan, and not Meredith, is the one who calls the cops. Why? Is she too impaired? She doesn’t report to the police until late the next morning, more than 15 hours after the accident. Her father, meanwhile, has refused to allow police to search the vehicle. He forces them to get a warrant.
* The recollection of the victim tells a story opposite of Nilan’s. The police investigation differs from the Nilan account on many crucial aspects. The physical evidence at the scene and on the Nilan vehicle support the claims of Moore and the police going against the alibis of Meredith Nilan, if we apply common sense and reason.
* Ah, the matter of the search warrant — ’tis a thing of beauty. Mysteriously, the Pittsfield police can’t get the courts in Pittsfield to issue a warrant. Was that because Cliffy Nilan knew they wouldn’t do so because of his connections there as the head of the Probation Department? Did he think police would give up or drop the case because it was politically too hot to handle?
* Police, though, don’t give up — to their eternal credit. THE PLANET gives the PPD its due. They get a warrant from the Southern Berkshire District Court.
* Pittsfield police charge Meredith Nilan with criminal misdemeanor counts. The courts are subject to a magistrate’s hearing.
Secret Hearing Bars Victim and His Lawyer; A Ringer Magistrate Railroads an Unbelievable Verdict
* The hearing is held in secret, Thursday, Jan. 12. THE PLANET is the only media source to investigate to give the public word of this.
* The magistrate has the option of opening or closing the hearing.
* The hearing is closed to the public. Let those damning words sink in for a moment. This of what they mean.
* The hearing is closed to the press.
* There is no independent witness to the proceedings. They can do what they damn well please, in short.
* The central Berkshire court brings in a ringer, Nathan Byrnes, an assistant clerk magistrate from Westfield, to hear the case. The defense claims Byrnes doesn’t know ANY of the people involved, which is a claim laughable on its surface, given the cozy nature of the court system. It’s not like Westfield is on the Dark Side of the Moon.
* The victim, Peter Moore, is not allowed to attend the hearing.
* The victim’s lawyer, by his own testimony, is not allowed to attend the hearing.
* Meredith Nilan’s lawyer, Tim Shugrue, Is allowed to attend and present evidence.
* The magistrate finds that there is insufficient evidence for the case to go to trial. This incredulous finding serves as a credible indictment of the Pittsfield District Court as an institution controlled by corrupt officials who have established two sets of laws: One for themselves and the GOBs, and one for everyone else, that is, the unwashed masses who don’t have favored status, as Meredith Nilan apparently does.
* Despite the fact that there is no independent confirmation of what went on in the hearing, the Boring Broadsheet — a newspaper once known as The Berkshire Eagle — dutifully prints the story of the finding. No harm, no foul. Oops. Sorry, Peter Moore. Get over it, big guy. The BB story — which runs without a byline, that is, anonymously —  only quotes Shugrue. It takes his account as whole cloth, including his spurious claim that a full evidential hearing was held. That turns out to be a false claim, since the other side in the case was not allowed to present or attend. The BB later beings a more responsible approach to its coverage, forced into doing to by public outrage and the pressure of this website’s coverage.
———————————————————-
We shall be back to post the next installment of today’s PLANET. Look soon for:
THE NILAN CASE WILL BE THE WATERLOO OF THE CITY’S SOUL.
Till then,
“OPEN THE WINDOW, AUNT MILLIE.”
LOVE TO ALL.
–End Dan Valenti’s coverage of Meredith Nilan’s hit and run:
Leave any questions in the Comments section, or write me directly: bill@williamgryan.nospam.mobi (leave out the obvious part) – /b/ill
William Ryan, MBA, MVP, MCTS
————————————————————–
KeyWords:  Meredith Nilan, Dan Valenti, Judge Rutberg, Planet Valenti, Planet Valenti Gag Order, Clifford Nilan, Clifford Nilan head of probation for Berkshire Superior Court, Peter Moore, Winesap Road, Bethzaida Sanabria-Vega, Central Berkshire District Court Bethzaida Sanabria-Vega

Welcome Instapundit Readers!  

Tuesday, January 24, 2012

Barack Obama and Joe Biden are charity cheapskates

Noblesse oblige?
WHO'S GREEDY? Obama Gave 1% to Charity, Romney Gave 15%
Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama and his wife Michelle gave $10,772 of the $1.2 million they earned from 2000 through 2004 to charities, or less than 1 percent, according to tax returns for those years released today by his campaign.
Joe Biden?  He gave $369 in charity!
And what about President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden in the run-up to their 2008 campaign?
USA Today broke it down here. In 2007, the Obamas gave more than $240,000 to charity, about 5.7 percent of their income. The Bidens gave an average of $369 to charity a year for the decade before he moved to the Naval Observatory - about 0.3 percent of their income. Back in 1997, then veep Al Gore and his then wife Tipper gave $353.
Since becoming veep, Biden hasn't become much more generous. In 2010, he gave $5,350, about 1.4 percent of income. That same year, Romney gave some $3 million. The national average is about three percent.
Biden, at least, does admit that Democrats are in charge and are responsible for the bad economy. (Maybe that explains why he is so cheap).  
Jeff Carter:  How much is Democrat John Kerry paying on his taxes?  
Ace:  Skinflints Obama and Biden
Obama is good on favors to his friends:  Soros and Buffett benefit from Obama's Keystone decision


Prior related EBL Posts:  
11 Stunning Revelations from Summers' secret memo to President Obama (give to charity with other people's money)
1. The stimulus was about implementing the Obama agenda.The short-run economic imperative was to identify as many campaign promises or high priority items that would spend out quickly and be inherently temporary. …  The stimulus package is a key tool for advancing clean energy goals and fulfilling a number of campaign commitments.
David Frum:  Obama's Critics are right!  Andrew Sullivan is wrong.  
Separated at Birth:  Barack Obama and...?


Thanks Glenn Reynolds!  Welcoms Instapundit Readers.  
Update:  What is Romney's real tax rate?  

Thursday, January 5, 2012

The continuing curious lies of Andrew Sullivan on the economy...

Before his abandonment of conservatism, Andrew Sullivan used to mix things up on a regular basis with Paul Krugman.  Back then (and still to this day), Krugman's positions was never objective when it came to his op-eds.  Good things always were due to Democratic and progressive-liberal policies.  Anything bad was due to Republicans and conservatives.

"intellectually dishonest, shamelessly manipulative and propagandistic in his arguments..."

While he would deny it, Sullivan has over the years completely morphed into Paul Krugman's partisan style.   Ever since his epiphany and crisis of faith about George Bush and the Iraq War a little more than half way through Bush's first term, virtually everything bad that has occurred to the economy is George Bush's fault (I suppose Sullivan would blame Sarah Palin for the 2008 economic meltdown if he could, but Sullivan has not yet figured out a way to tie it into Alaska gubernatorial politics yet).


And because he is taking the fight to conservatives, the left rarely ever calls him on anything anymore.  But occasionally, even left leaning publications cannot ignore Sullivan's insanity.  Of course it later turned out that Andrew Sullivan was not telling the truth about The Dish being a "one man political blog."  But why let facts get in the way of his ego?


Andrew Sullivan's continuing mantra is that economic crisis is George W. Bush's fault and but for Barack Obama, things would have been far far worse.  He takes regular pot shots at Glenn Reynolds and others, claiming that all data contrary to Sullivan's view is "bullshit."  As Sullivan noted yesterday:
But yesterday Reynolds reprinted the graph with the same bullshit analysis. Proof of an out-and-proud propagandist, who cannot even address the single point of a criticism.
This circular on Sullivan's part.  Sullivan also ignores the other six graphs Reynolds referenced.  I guess this is not surprising.  As others have noted, Sullivan lacks a understanding of economics and history.


That is not to let President Bush off the hook. Bush, Rove, Alan Greenspan, and some Republicans certainly played a role and share some responsibility in what happened, and Bush has to take responsibility because it happened on his watch.  There is plenty of bipartisan responsibility to go around.  But Sullivan's blaming of Bush, Paulson and Republicans is disingenuous given that Bill Clinton relied on Rubin, Geithner, and Summer (all tied into Goldman Sachs as Paulson was) in his term, and Barack Obama is again relying on Geithner and Summer now.  Wall Street players are Barack Obama's and the Democratic Party's biggest supporters.   As noted by Kevin Williamson, Wall Street players are promoting policies that benefit their positions currently, by having key people embedded throughout the Obama Administration. Williamson's critique of Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner's past business experience is particularly well stated (and scathing).  Sullivan is completely silent on such issues.  


The biggest players and contributor to the economic meltdown were Freddie and Fannie Mac.  Democrats in the center of this crisis agree that the problem arose in the housing markets.   And the biggest player and contributor to the meltdown were Freddie and Fannie Mac:

In "Reckless Endangerment," Morgenson and Rosner offer considerable censure for reckless bankers, lax rating agencies, captured regulators and unscrupulous businessmen. But the greatest responsibility for the collapse of the housing market and the near "Armageddon" of the American economy belongs to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and to the politicians who created and protected them. With a couple of prominent exceptions, the politicians were Democrats claiming to do good for the poor. Along the way, they enriched themselves and their friends, stuffed their campaign coffers, and resisted all attempts to enforce market discipline. When the inevitable collapse arrived, the entire economy suffered, but no one more than the poor.
How Democrats Nearly Destroyed The Economy.


If we were going to pick the two most responsible for the mess we are in, it would be Chris Dodd (D) and Barney Frank (D).  
Fannie Mae lied about its profits, intimidated adversaries, bought off members of Congress with lavish contributions, hired (and thereby co-opted) academics, purchased political ads (through its foundation) and stacked congressional hearings with friendly bankers, community activists and advocacy groups (including ACORN). Fannie Mae also hired the friends and relations of key members of Congress (including Rep. Barney Frank's partner).
As Newt Gingrich noted on October 11, 2011, what occurred with Dodd and Frank may have gone beyond mere mistakes of policy:
“Well in Chris Dodd’s case, go back and look at the Countryside deals,” Gingrich insisted. “In Barney Frank’s case, go back and look at the lobbyists he was close to at Freddie Mac. All I’m saying is that everybody in the media who wants to go after the business community ought to start to go after the politicians who have been at the heart of the sickness which is weakening this country.”
Back in 2004, Sullivan promoted John Kerry's candidacy because he claimed the Democrats would never spend as recklessly as Bush (with the influence of Karl Rove) had done (that the guy he promoted for president has subsequently been found to have engaged in self serving insider trading and tax avoidance has not seemed to have bothered Sullivan).  Many conservatives spoke out against Bush's spending and the Medicare Prescription Drug Expansion at the time.  And of course, most of the Democrats in Congress supported it, which is how it managed to become law.


Is Andrew "The Conservative Soul" Sullivan promoting a Paul Ryan approach to government spending and entitlements?  Is Sullivan calling the Obama administration out the way he called out the Bush administration?  No, Sullivan is silent on the massive deficit spending being done by the Obama Administration, or, using the excuse it is all Bush's fault and Barack Obama just has to do the heavy lifting.  But wait a second, didn't the head of the DNC claim that the Democrats and Barack Obama own the economy now?  How long can we blame George Bush for the situation we are in?  Well, from Sullivan's perspective, at least through the 2012 election I suppose.  


Rather than periodic attacks on Glenn Reynolds, perhaps Andrew Sullivan could examine his own "conservative soul" and reflect on how he lost it and how he can get it back?  


Prior Post:  Andrew Sullivan is confused on the economy.


Update:  Welcome Instapundit readers.  


Kudos for Sullivan for creative insult writing:  In The Dish today Sullivan (or perhaps one of his employees) wrote this:  "Gingrich is a festering white-head of loathing. Which is why his smile looks so terrifying and false."  

More evidence of delusion.  Sullivan has a post today entitled:  "Iran:  "The Sarah Palin of Nations"  Not as witty as the Gringrich snark above, but it shows when it comes to Sarah Palin, Andrew Sullivan cannot quit her.  


Update II:  Barney Frank, Serial Liar