Showing posts with label Michael Medved. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Michael Medved. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 2, 2024

Michael Medved is off Seattle Conservative Talk Radio

 



This is probably long coming. Medved could certainly retire and his NeverTrump stance (even in Seattle) has not been popular. There is a small bitter pie to split for the David French, Bill Kristol, and Lincoln Project Losers. Medved has been set adrift.  

Some may argue he is just being true to principles. I would say it is more never admitting he might be wrong. There is plenty to criticize about Trump, but plenty to celebrate too, but being NeverTrump is never admitting you might be wrong. 

Friday, August 22, 2014

The police in America are still the good guys

I don't always agree with Michael Medved, but this article is spot on:

Capt. Ron Johnson of the Missouri Highway Patrol


I significant number of black Americans would disagree. Black Americans and their communities suffer mostly from black on black crime (white on black crime and police shooting of blacks are in fact rare), yet they often do not see the police as their saviors. They feel like they are targeted more by the police and have a resentment of that.  But Medved makes a legitimate point here:
Even at a time of intense public controversy over policing in the black community, it's worth remembering that literally tens of thousands of African-American lives have been saved due to enhancements in police training, tactics and equipment in the past two decades. With black people making up nearly half of all homicide victims, no community has benefited more substantially from plummeting homicide rates.
I still do not know whether Officer Wilson's shooting of Michael Brown was justified or not. I do not have enough facts to determine that. Rationally investigating this matter and then objectively reviewing the evidence is the frist step before jumping to conclusions.  If Officer Wilson is guilty of a crime then he should be prosecuted, but sacrificing an individual officer so politicians can personally benefit from it before the evidence is even collected is not justice. And that is the message I would expect our leaders to convey on this particular case. President Obama should have cut short one of his golf outings so he had sufficient time to point this out, but his failure is one of omission and politics. The President is not leading but trying to pander to both is base and public opinion. Governor Jay Nixon's performance in connection with Ferguson has been a failure and a disgrace and I hope his national political ambitions are finished over this matter.

There is a huge separation of perception and perspective regarding the events in Ferguson.  Attitude matters and it is a problem at the federal as well as local level. The police are certainly not blameless. Some claim the police started violence, but it is also clear outside agitators went to Ferguson with the goal of causing an incident.

These policing principles formulated in 19th century England are still completely true today:
PRINCIPLE 1 “The basic mission for which the police exist is to prevent crime and disorder.”
PRINCIPLE 2 “The ability of the police to perform their duties is dependent upon public approval of police actions.”
PRINCIPLE 3 “Police must secure the willing cooperation of the public in voluntary observance of the law to be able to secure and maintain the respect of the public.”
PRINCIPLE 4 “The degree of cooperation of the public that can be secured diminishes proportionately to the necessity of the use of physical force.”
PRINCIPLE 5 “Police seek and preserve public favor not by catering to the public opinion but by constantly demonstrating absolute impartial service to the law.”
PRINCIPLE 6 “Police use physical force to the extent necessary to secure observance of the law or to restore order only when the exercise of persuasion, advice and warning is found to be insufficient.”
PRINCIPLE 7 “Police, at all times, should maintain a relationship with the public that gives reality to the historic tradition that the police are the public and the public are the police; the police being only members of the public who are paid to give full-time attention to duties which are incumbent on every citizen in the interests of community welfare and existence.”
PRINCIPLE 8 “Police should always direct their action strictly towards their functions and never appear to usurp the powers of the judiciary.”
PRINCIPLE 9 “The test of police efficiency is the absence of crime and disorder, not the visible evidence of police action in dealing with it.”
Police body and dash cameras are an excellent idea for avoiding disputes like this, provided there are proper policies in place to go along with those cameras.  There is also a very strong argument that overly militarizing police (as a national policy) is not a good idea. These are debates we should be having.

But in the short term on Ferguson, The Other McCain offered the best advice.

Update:
They are not so smart at The New Republic!
Star witness against Officer Wilson
Seachange on Military Weapons (hint, people don't like them)
MC Hammer resurfaces alive in Darren Wilson's head
Fredrick Wilson II on Ferguson

Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Yeti Bigfoot Sasquatch is for real?

I am not buying it...especially after Peckergate.
Then again, perhaps those Russians got a sample of Michael Moore's hair? 
h/t:
Update:
I am sure this Yeti is as real as this Bigfoot/Sasquatch.

Monday, May 21, 2012

2012 Presidential Election Interactive Map: Romney has a tough fight ahead


*The above map assumes Romney wins Indiana
2012 Presidential Election Interactive Map:
  • Romney has to win every state John McCain won in 2008 (now worth 180 electoral votes due to redistricting).  He should be able to do this.  
  • Romney has to win back traditional GOP states (that Obama took in 2008) of Indiana*, North Carolina, and Virginia (worth 39 electoral votes).  Indiana and North Carolina (at least today) would vote for Romney over Obama.  Virginia will be tougher.  
  • Romney has to win the battle ground states of Ohio and Florida  (worth 47 electoral votes).   
VotesRemainingMust Win (for 270)
 Democrats21753PA,WI,CO,IA,NV,NH1 Winning Combination »
 Republicans2664--6 Winning Combinations »
New! Ties
  • Romney has to win one more toss up state to push him over 270 electoral votes.    
You can go on the link and try your own combinations.

Michael Medved offers disaster scenerios if Romney wins electoral votes but loses the popular vote to Obama.  To some extent that is future tripping.  At this point Romney cannot assume any state is won.  There are other reasons for Romney to visit some of these blue states.

Update:  Don't be over confident.  Daily Kos is likely correct on some of these state numbers.  

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Michael Medved asks: Hey guys, Let's pick the least scary Republican! Update: Sarah Palin says: I would vote for Newt in South Carolina.

To your proposition Mr. Medved, I respond...
No.  (Anyway Jon Huntsman is out of the race, who else do you have in mind?)
Of course it turns on how one describes "least scary."  The least scary to me is the MOST CONSERVATIVE, but I do not think that is what you intended.
Sort of fitting that you first published your article in The Daily Beast, that bastion for conservative thought.

Update:   Sarah Palin just said if she were in South Carolina, she would vote for Newt?

Can Newt Over Come Newt? (S.E. Cupp's funny parody of Newt)

Welcome Instapundit readers:  Here is the Sarah Palin video.  

The Other McCain:  Who does Newt think he is...
Ace of Spades HQ:  Sarah Palin Endorses Newt (Sort of)