Will Republicans agree?
Powerline: How would you like Big Bird served?
Don Surber: Shuttering 80 Agencies: Is Reaganism Dead?
I do not mind the short term budget deal (that part is fine, we do not need a fight over that)...![]() |
| I fear this is just an opportunity for Democrats to change the topic from Obamacare... |
.@rsmccain I thought it was rather sweet how that Oompa Loompa serenaded Paul.
— Joe Matthew (@KoenigJojo) December 11, 2013
HMM: Budget Deal Is Sealed. “Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) and Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) announced a budget deal Tuesday evening that would call for about $1 trillion in federal spending in 2014 while replacing some sequestration cuts. The deal replaces $63 billion in sequester cuts over two years and trims an additional $23 billion in long-term deficits. The agreement falls far short of the grand budget bargain Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) and President Obama once envisioned. But if passed, it will bring a measure of fiscal peace to the capital for the first time since Republicans took control of the House in 2010.”Obama Announces 0 Million Plan To Find A Brain For Joe Biden… shar.es/dYK05 via @sharethis
— ★♥ Harriet Baldwin(@HarrietBaldwin) April 2, 2013
![]() |
| Barack Obama does not get it. |
![]() |
| Bloomberg has become a drooling idiot... |
If a #Sequester falls in the forest and there is no one there to hear it does the WH threaten Bob Woodward?
— Tracy Lee (@RememberComeNov) March 1, 2013
That's it. I'm moving to Woodbury. #Sequester
— AG (@AG_Conservative) March 1, 2013
Breaking: The dead have arisen from their graves and are eating the brains of the living... Biden unthreatened... #SequesterApocalypse
— El SOOPer!! (@SooperMexican) March 1, 2013
The Bob Woodward story isn't important. That's why liberals and the media (PTR) are losing their minds over it.
— Jim Treacher (@jtLOL) February 28, 2013
![]() |
| Hey. |
Remember: They're not attacking Bob Woodward because they think he's lying. They're attacking him because they think he's telling the truth.
— Jim Treacher (@jtLOL) February 28, 2013
Woodward’s greatest sin was practicing real journalism in the age of Obama nblo.gs/INeHJUpdate:
— Legal Insurrection (@LegInsurrection) February 28, 2013
![]() |
| I will gladly pay you on Tuesday for a hamburger today... |
![]() |
| I wlll gladly agree to budget restrictions on a Tuesday sometime in 2017 for a budget ceiling raising today... |
My post: The GOP Is Ready To Cave On Sandy Pork . . . And The Debt Ceiling. goo.gl/W6C33
— Gabriel Malor (@gabrielmalor) January 15, 2013
![]() |
| Paul Krugman, Needs some dinner budge control... Update: Introducing: ‘The Krugmanerrand’ |
![]() |
| Jonathan Chait, Love New Deal--Hates Bush |
Why did Matthew Yglesias decide to completely beclown himself by pushing this crazy $1 trillion platinum coin nonsense?Update (via Hot Air):
— Robert Stacy McCain (@rsmccain) January 11, 2013
![]() |
| There is not enough pork in the world to feed my appetite! |
![]() |
| If it is not massage oils it is oil profits... |
![]() |
| Al is full of it... |
![]() |
| Tina Brown Profligate spender of scores of millions of other people's money... |
![]() |
| U.S. Congress (with a lot of Obama help) Profligate spender of a score of trillions of other people's money... |
![]() |
| Ross Douthat: The fundamental problem with Obama's war on the rich... |
Is a Democratic Party that shies away from raising taxes on the $250,000-a-year earner (or the $399,999-a-year earner, for that matter) in 2013 — when those increases are happeningly automatically! — really going to find it easier to raise taxes on families making $110,000 in 2017 or 2021? Color me skeptical: The lesson of these negotiations seems to be that Democrats are still skittish about anything that ever-so-remotely resembles a middle class tax increase, let alone the much larger tax increases (which would eventually have to hit people making well below $100,000 as well) that their philosophy of government ultimately demands.
Agreeing that the New Year’s bargain bodes ill for the liberal vision of government doesn’t require believing that Paul Ryan’s vision of government is poised to triumph instead. Here I agree with Scheiber: Because Social Security and Medicare are so popular, the right-wing path to fiscal sustainability does sometimes have an air of fantasy about it. It’s just that on the evidence of what the Obama White House and Senate Democrats have been willing to concede this week, the left-wing path to solvency looks pretty implausible right now as well.Can you choose both? Here is Instapundit's proposal:
That’s the problem with that whole war on the rich. Obama’s enemies are the small-business Kulaks, who vote Republican, but he can’t go after them without hurting the nobles who support Democrats financially.Then again Legal Insurrection is definitely leaning half empty... I liked the comment that Hookers put up more resistance than the GOP did. Well of course, hookers demand payment first.
I’d push 5% per year cuts in federal spending across the board — no “flexible freeze” BS — and do it each year until the deficit was under control. I think this would sell fairly well politically, too. Nobody believes that any federal department couldn’t cut costs 5% without impacting performance.