I do not know the set up for this video, but let's assume for argument sake it was a fair cross section of people. Some of those questions posed are profound (mother and father together, father figure in family, access to good schools) some trivial (such as paying for a cell phone)--but the real profound question raised is video is why the discrepancy between these kids? I can think of one big factor that has played a role: The policy incentives of Lyndon Johnson's War on Poverty have in reality been a war on families. It has been a social experiment going on for fifty years and the outcome has been a catastrophe for the people it was meant to help.
It is not a "white" thing. What about Asian privilege? What about West Indie privilege? I would suggest that the factor for success in those groups is having strong families. Reciprocally, white culture, where the family structure breaks down, results (for the most part) in very bad outcomes.
Economics of course play a role. A bad economy puts strains on families and can contribute to disintegration. But strong families are better at riding downturns and dysfunctional families will often continue to fail even when things are going well.
Families succeed when they rely on each other to raise self reliant strong children. A child who had parents who stuck together and raised him or her should not feel guilty for that, but thankful. If you were blessed with a strong family that supported you, by all means share that success with others less fortunate. But rather than attempting to make the children of successful families feel guilty for doing well, maybe we should be all addressing the social issues that make this disparity happen to different groups. Hint: It is not racism, at least not as racism is currently defined by leftists and the media.
Nicholas Kristof says in the light of Ferguson race deserves more attention than it gets. Mr. Kristof points out the economic disparity between black and white Americans. As Kristof notes: "The black-white income gap is roughly 40 percent greater today than it was in 1967." The question that Mr. Kristof raises that deserves far more attention is why is that the case?