Showing posts with label right of privacy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label right of privacy. Show all posts

Friday, July 10, 2015

Tuesday, April 29, 2014

Kareem Abdul-Jabbar has some excellent commentary about Donald Sterling…

That is some well said commentary (read the whole thing)
What bothers me about this whole Donald Sterling affair isn’t just his racism. I’m bothered that everyone acts as if it’s a huge surprise. Now there’s all this dramatic and very public rending of clothing about whether they should keep their expensive Clippers season tickets. Really? All this other stuff I listed above has been going on for years and this ridiculous conversation with his girlfriend is what puts you over the edge? That’s the smoking gun? 
He was discriminating against black and Hispanic families for years, preventing them from getting housing. It was public record. We did nothing. Suddenly he says he doesn’t want his girlfriend posing with Magic Johnson on Instagram and we bring out the torches and rope. Shouldn’t we have all called for his resignation back then? 
Shouldn’t we be equally angered by the fact that his private, intimate conversation was taped and then leaked to the media? Didn’t we just call to task the NSA for intruding into American citizen’s privacy in such an un-American way? Although the impact is similar to Mitt Romney’s comments that were secretly taped, the difference is that Romney was giving a public speech. The making and release of this tape is so sleazy that just listening to it makes me feel like an accomplice to the crime. We didn’t steal the cake but we’re all gorging ourselves on it.
Rush Limbaugh:  Donald Sterling is a typical Hollywood racist--and everybody knew it…
Rule 5 Raaaaacism

Update:
DaTechGuy: The hypocrisy of the NAACP
I agree with Darcy's nuance about Kareem's comments...  I also fully understand why the NBA did what it did. This is sparking a lot of anger with players and fans, they are trying to respond to that. And what Stirling said (while stupid, indefensible, and pathetic) does impact business for all the owners.

h/t: Instapundit 

Thursday, March 29, 2012

Roseann Barr tweets home address for George Zimmerman's parents...

Nasty and Vicious
Reckless Endangerment?  
Related stories:
Manipulating images:  A picture says a thousand words
Trayvon Martin Rashomon 
Whatever actually happened in the Martin case — and we still don’t know the whole truth of it — it’s a bad thing for an unarmed kid to get shot.But the liberals insisted on portraying this incident with a certain slant: Saint Trayvon, innocent martyr to racism, with George Zimmerman portrayed as being incited to violence by right-wing talk radio.
Neither basic element of that narrative was accurate...

Saturday, January 7, 2012

George and Diane's Big Fat Republican Gay Debate

Contraception?     Leave it alone George...  Drudge is right this debate was a Stephanopo-mess.


The Other McCain's POST-DEBATE SPIN ROOM   RSM was a little cranky but I agree with him on this:
"I’m feeling kind of cranky tonight. What the hell was this, the Big Gay Debate starring “Phil from Virginia”? Why are we letting George and Diane moderate a Republican debate? How drunk was Diane Sawyer tonight, huh?"
A constitutional amendment on marriage is very unlikely to ever happen.  The GOP candidates--(even Santorum) are not focused on this issue because it really is not a federal issue.  Most people do not care that much about this, they care about the economy and the direction the country is going on fiscal and foreign policy.  But these questions show that the moderators would rather engaged in shenanigans (trying to create a wedge issue that will hurt the GOP in the general election), which is why the GOP must take over its own primary debates.


And given all the questions Little George S. asked tonight, he is obviously curious and needs some explanation of how things work...I think he needs a sit down with him on this topic.

Update:  Ann Althouse says no law professor would allow her student to answer the way Romney did.  Well yeah, but George Stephanopo-mess is not conducting a constitutional law seminar Ann.  Stephanopo-mess was trying to create a wedge issue for the general election with Obama that can be used against whoever is the GOP nominee.


Update II:  Apparently David Gregory could not leave the issue alone either this morning in the GOP Sunday Morning Debate.  So now we know Rick Santorum would love his hypothetical gay son.  Who schedules a debate Saturday night and another debate Sunday morning?  All these gay questions!  Are George and David trying to tell us something?