Showing posts with label Victor Davis Hanson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Victor Davis Hanson. Show all posts

Monday, March 3, 2025

VDH: Zelensky Takeaways





RedState: Shock Poll Post Zelensky Blow Up (Zelensky choose poorly)










Mark Steyn: Give War A Chance

Wednesday, October 6, 2021

Why Victor Davis Hanson Left National Review

 

Real Clear Politics: Victor Davis Hanson explains why he left...

It is not so much VDH left NR, but NR left VDH...

National Review is dead. It mostly died when WFB, Jr. passed away (although certainly in decline before that) and later when it abandoned Mark Steyn. And while I thought WFB, Jr. was a hero (like Rush Limbaugh did), you have to ask why so many alumni from NR betray conservative ideals. From David Brooks on down they tend to be the most craven sort of whores (happy to take a check to betray conservatism, regardless of who is in office). True conservatives from National Review?  There are a few, but not many. The whole #NeverTrumper hissy fit ultimately destroyed what was left of NR. VDH is better freelancing on his own.  

The only good thing you can say about National Review now is it is not quite as bad as William Kristol and the Weekly Standard (although NR alumni David French is right up there). It has essentially hit the same reef and the ship is taking on water fast. #Ahoy.

RedState was almost just as bad as the Weakly Standard, until Salem purged it.



AoSHQ: Morning Report 10.06.21


Wednesday, March 13, 2019

Who Is Attacking Conservatives?


Tucker Carlson is getting attacked by Media Matters. Anyone who has been paying attention knows that Media Matters is evil and depraved

We also saw this week Facebook banning ZeroHedge. Facebook fortunately backed own on that, but why did it happen in the first place? Why do these mistakes only happen to those on the right (or in ZeroHedge's case libertarian)?

Who needs Media Matters though when you have RealConservatives™attacking Victor David Hanson? Why would they do this? Because Hanson had the temerity of defending Trump.  

Victory Girls: Tucker Carlson Will Not Apologize

Tuesday, August 11, 2015

So why is Hillary Clinton backing the Iran Deal?

Come on Glenn, Roger and VDH, it is not just Barack Obama pulling Hillary's strings!

Here is another Sound of Music reference.  

Instapundit: Paint me green and call me Esmeraldathe Clinton probe spreads to key allies and everyone must understand the American era is over and Obama is welcoming it

Lem's Levity: Top Secret Emails Found on Hillary's Server, Image most downloaded by foreign hackers of Hillary's emails, and Hillary to give her private email server to Justice
The Corner/National Journal: Jonah, Sexton, and Fournier

Monday, October 15, 2012

Victor Davis Hanson on the Obama Breaking point...

Victor Hanson clarifies where the election is at quite well:  

In the first debate, Romney was not just far better-informed and spoken, but far more likeable. Joe Biden’s frenzied rudeness was the sort of debate performance that mesmerizes one by its very boorishness, eliciting a weird reaction in the room like “Come over and check this out: I can’t believe the Vice president of the United States is trumping The Joker” (after all, the sick Joker is more entertaining that the sober and judicious Batman) — but within hours leaves a bitter aftertaste in the mouth of something along the lines of “Surely, we could have done better than that rude buffoon?”The election is not over, but it is starting to resemble October 29 or November 1 in 1980, when, after just one debate, the nation at last decided that it really did not like Jimmy Carter very much or what he had done, and discovered that Ronald Reagan was not the mad Dr. Strangelove/Jefferson Davis of the Carter summer television ads. Like Carter, Obama both has no wish to defend his record (who would?) and is just as petulant. In the next three weeks, he has only three hours left to save his presidency.
This is very similar to what Brit Hume noted after the first Obama-Romney debate.  It was not that Romney overwhelmed Obama in debating style (although Romney did do well and Obama seemed flat), but that Obama lost that debate because Obama had a bad record to defend.

Of course, townhall debates can be unpredictable.  Both sides are unsure what sort of factor will Candy Crowley be at the event.   But unless Obama has some fabulous night tomorrow, Obama is being buried by his own record.

And given the first debate, what can Barack Obama really do?  Unlike the Reagan-Mondale debates (where Reagan had a bad first debate night), Reagan also had a record to actually defend (unlike Obama).  And he was Ronald Reagan:

h/t:  The Blogmocracy

Tuesday, May 15, 2012

The Boston Globe corrects itself: No proof of Elizabeth Warren being Native American...

The Boston Globe finally catches up to where most other people have been for a while now:
Correction: Because of a reporting error, a story in the May 1 Metro section and the accompanying headline incorrectly described the 1894 document that was purported to list Elizabeth Warren’s great-great-great grandmother as a Cherokee. The document, alluded to in a family newsletter found by the New England Historic Genealogical Society, was an application for a marriage license,  not the license itself. Neither the society nor the Globe has seen the primary document, whose existence has not been proven.
Translation of these smoke signals:  Elizabeth Warren appears to be a pale face!  


And the only proof of connection to the Cherokee so far:  One of her relatives helped round up the tribe for the Trail of Tears to Oklahoma.  


Update:  Bob Belevedere has a post linking to Victor Davis Hanson on this subject.  Definitely worth reading.  Bob and VDH are both spot on  (Bob's criticism is justified but at least VDH gets to where he needs to get).  


First Harvard woman of color?  Well technically pinkish is a color, but she was hardly the first woman.



Sunday, January 1, 2012

A wonderful commentary on Christopher Hitchens...



Father Barron discusses Christopher Hitchens

H/T to Michael Potemra and K-Lo at the Corner

I will miss Christopher Hitchens.

Update:  How not to be an atheist activist.  The amazing thing about Christopher is most believers (of the religious bent) did not hate him for his atheism activism, and in fact, many loved him and were big fans.  Ironically it is the left that seemed to have more problems with Hitchens because they thought he betrayed their religious dogma.  

Update II:  Great comments by VDH