Thursday, October 5, 2017

Question to Obama, Pelosi and Feinstein and the rest of the Democrats on Gun Control

Dianne Feinstein, Democrat poser

If gun control is so important, why didn't Democrats pass gun control legislation when they controlled the White House, House and Senate (with a Filibuster proof majority)? 
🤔🔫🥆
Nancy Pelosi gave this explanation: “Looking at the calendar, there was very little time to get something like that done.”

With all the media and leftist celebrity ranting over the NRA and Republicans, why aren't they holding Democrats accountable? Why no outrage over that? 

Instapundit: Andrew Klavan: American Heroes and Universal Evil, The Democrats really truly do want to take all your guns, I am not inclined to give up my gun rights to people who want to enslave or in some cases kill me, Repeal the 2nd Amendment, After Las Vegas, Democrats send in the clowns, A statistician reconsiders her support of gun control after looking at the data, Why did everyone just forget about Orlando shooting?, Victim of Las Vegas still against Gun Control, and Steve Scalise's view of gun rights fortified after his shooting

EBL: John Ringo has a theory on Las Vegas, Vile CBS attorney Haley Geftman-Gold has no sympathy, Over 50 killed, hundreds injured in Las Vegas. Dana Loesch, and Frying Pan Control

Mark Steyn: Theory of the Case: Mark is right, what was the shooter trying to accomplish, its seems very coldly calculating of achieving a political result, The Empty Paddock and Continued

Really?

Instapundit: THR: Sabo Strikes Again, This Time Against Kimmel

Diongenes' Middle Finger:  Hypocrisy and Democrat Demagoguery Reign Supreme, Bang A Drum, and Just a reminder to the drolling leftists among us...

AoSHQ: Morning Rant, Richard Burr and an eraser, 538 and the WaPo: Statistics show gun control doesn't work?, Vegas Report, CBS fires attorney



Posted by at
Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

4 comments:

  1. edutcherOctober 5, 2017 at 7:00 PM

    The so-called bump stock, which has the Demos in such a lather and is illustrated at the link, is basically something to save a little weight or, for the insecure, to make you look like Rambo or Ahnold. And (ta da) it was authorized by the, uh, previous Administration because, in the words of ATF The stock has no automatically functioning mechanical parts or springs and performs no automatic mechanical function when installed.

    And these nitwits think they're gonna retake Congress next year.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Evi L. BloggerladyOctober 5, 2017 at 7:07 PM

      Craven dem lawmakers know this, they are looking for some sort of action for their base (who are completely ignorant about firearms and have no idea what a bump stock is). Hence crazy stuff about "automatic ammo" and other insane stuff they come up with.

      Republicans will probably go along with this because not many people care about bump stocks other than those who already have them. Meanwhile we don't know why Paddock did what he did.

      Delete
    2. edutcherOctober 5, 2017 at 9:05 PM

      I think the only Republicans will probably go along with this will be the Whigs.

      Which means it will never get past the House.

      Delete
  2. Mike aka ProofOctober 5, 2017 at 8:00 PM

    ypocrisy over guns is nothing new to her. Di Fi's rise to power came in the wake of the George Moscone/Harvey Milk shooting. She became mayor and passed an unConstitutional ban on handguns in SF that was overturned by the state supreme court. She had a CCW permit herself and famously, publicly turned in her handgun. Unfortunately for her, it was not the weapon specified on her permit.

    ReplyDelete

I welcome all legitimate comments. Keep it civil. Spam will be deleted. Thanks.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)