Saturday, October 29, 2016

Attorney General Loretta Lynch pleads the 5th Amendment and yet the New Yorker claims FBI Director James Comey breaks with tradition?


This is not Loretta Lynch asserting Executive Privilege, this is the Attorney General refusing to testify because her answers could potentially incriminate her.  Think about that.  

So it is curious how The New Yorker's Jane Mayer is now suddenly concerned about James Comey braking with Lynch and Justice Department tradition over all these emails found on Huma Abedin and Anthony Weiner's computer.  Do you think there might be a double standard?


Clinton News Network turns on Comey (never go against the Clinton Family)

ABC News: Lynch objected to Comey's decision to inform Congress (of course, Lynch takes the 5th Amendment when Congress questions her)




EBL: The Fredo Corleone of the Clinton Crime Family and AoSHQ Three Flaming Skulls: Comey to Reopen FBI Investigation

Mark Steyn: The Questions That Were Never Put (In Public) and Beyond The Margins Of Lawyer

American Power Blog: Hillary Clinton Presidency Will Be Tainted From Day One and One Word

DaTechGuy: Hillary and her Media Find Themselves In The Mutara Nebula

Regular Right Guy: Hillary hopes the Voting Dead will Save Her

Rush Limbaugh: FBI Reopens Hillary email investigation

Smitty: Suggestion for what to do with Hillary

Lem's Place: Lynching The Fifth

Hot Air: Comey Caught

RedState: Biden!

No comments:

Post a Comment

I had to stop Anonymous comments due to spam. But I welcome all legitimate comments. Thanks.