Instapundit: How did Pelley lose when the game is rigged?
It shouldn't be a winning losing thing. Sixty Minutes should be objective enough to report on an interesting story fairly--rather than being on the attack. But we know how rare that is--at least when it comes to anyone on the right. I watched Mike Cernovich's appearance on Sixty Minutes (as well as the on-line stuff CBS released) and I thought Mike did an excellent job.
In a way Scott Kelley really did not get whooped. Yes the actually show was heavily edited, but Pelley could have been completely dishonest and through editing made Cernovich look like an idiot. Pelley did not do that. Pelley is an establishment guy who is skeptical about a guy like Cernovich; but Pelley let Cernovich, even during the tv show, make his case. Cernovich afterward agreed it was fair.
EBL: Mike Cernovich on Sixty Minutes and the very real attack on Garland, Texas
Danger and Play: Cernovich gives Sixty Minutes its first ratings win since 2008, Cernovich holds a mirror up to 'Fake News'
Powerline: It's 2004 All Over Again
Instapundit: Garland victim to FBI: Did you sit back and let me get shot?, Mike Cernovich scoops all the Media on Susan Rice's possible felonious acts and Sadly, True!
EBL: Susan Rice looks good in Orange
Instapundit: ANCHOR AWAY? CBS ‘Star’ Scott Pelley’s Ratings Tank as He Goes After Trump. Is He a Goner? But he got so many plaudits from his fellow media folks. (Pelly would do way better by playing it straight and not opining so much)