To tell the truth, if Scott's argument was persuasive enough on both sides; I could go along with him. It wouldn't change my overall goal of this election: lower the desire to give more power to the singular office of the President.
I get the impression that Scott is playing his "endorsements" for laughs, and do not necessarily reflect the voting intentions of the staff or management.
I had to stop Anonymous comments due to spam. But I welcome all legitimate comments. Thanks.