@ConservativeLA @AmPowerBlog Yes, Monica Lewinsky WAS more attractive than Sydney Leathers. There, I've said it. #MoreToLoveRobert Stacy McCain goes places you would not expect a journalist to immediately go, but when you see what he is putting out there you know this is a question that definitely needed to be asked. That my friends, is vision.
— Robert Stacy McCain (@rsmccain) July 30, 2013
It is also a good excuse for a Rule 5 post. You decide folks, Monica Lewinsky or Sydney Leathers?
By the way...
|Who did tip off Buzz Feed on Sydney Leathers and Anthony Weiner?|
Aaawwww. Huma Abedin to take extended vacation from Hillary Clinton (the Clintons did do it!)
Clintons on the war path against Weiner...
Anthony Weiner liked to call interns working for him "Monica"
TOM: Democrats just want abortions and gropes by Bob Filner...
TOM: Andrew Breitbart was right...
TOM: Democrat Gentleman Jim Moran hates babies, loves puppies...
TOM: Lewinski or Leathers?
TOM: Weiner's tweet buddy is a Democrat...
TOM: Rule 5 Monday
Yeah, definitely Lewinsky. She was a cute plumper.ReplyDelete
Saying Monica is better-looking isn't saying much if you've gotten a decent look at Sydney Leathers (there's a name), but Olivia Nuzzi beats them both.ReplyDelete
That's true, but if you had to pick, but if you look at Sydney Leathers dumpling legs, I'd pass. :DReplyDelete
Having had looks at both of them, ed, it's pretty easy to figure Monica is better looking.ReplyDelete
And Olivia Nuzzi looks like some kind of deformed horse.
Yes, I realize I'm in the minority.