Why the disparity of coverage between the massacres in Sri Lanka and New Zealand? 🤔

Consider that a mass tragedy happened on the holiest of holidays today. It targeted more people, killed more people, and had more suspects.

It’s receiving less than 1/1000th of the coverage New Zealand did.

All “news” is programmed. It’s not authentic. None of it.#SriLanka

— Ali Alexander ✝️ (@ali) April 21, 2019

Ali nails it above. The media does not care about dead Christians. They mostly don't care about Muslims deaths either, unless there is an angle to the story they want to exploit. New Zealand had a white perpetrator, so it fit their bill (they can gloss over his lefty side, since he was a white supremacist).

We can find plenty of other examples that follow this pattern. Connect the dots. Don't all lives matter? Short answer is definitely not to the media.

Instapundit: Revisiting Islam's greatest slaughter of Christians, It's Islamophobic to report the name of the terrorist mastermind behind this?, Baldilocks on the media "othering", That's Different, Harsh, but Fair, Democrats and "Easter worshipers" and Journalists & "but"

EBL: Over 200 359 Killed in Sri Lanka Terror Attack and New Zealand Terrorism Victims, RIP

PJ Media: Roger Simon: New Zealand and Sri Lanka attacks were not the same

Rush Limbaugh: Democrats Denounce Slaughter of 'Easter Worshipers'

TOM: In The Mailbox 04.22.19 and Is your far right anger stoked yet?

Hot Air: Sri Lanka Horror: Death toll now 290, government warned

RedState: Democrats avoid this word in Sri Lanka bombing

AoSHQ: Democrats and "Easter Worshipers"

AP: ISIS claims responsibility for attack

Mark Steyn: Taqiyya for Easter

Powerline: Happy Easter

AoSHQ: Morning Report 04.22.19