[Valid Atom 1.0]

Wednesday, July 20, 2016

#FreeStacy #FreeMilo #FuckTwitter

Robert Stacy McCain and Milo Yiannopoulos: Banned from Twitter



Milo Yiannopoulos: No regrets 

The New York Times takes the side of Twitter (of course) even though this alleged abuse is nothing more than people disliking what others might have to say.  Had this been a liberal person banned, the Times and others would be in full outrage mode.  

Twitter can set the rules for its service. We only ask that they be applied in a neutral and fair manner. That is definitely not the case.  




So sorry if I don't take Twitter's sentiments about treating people with respect all that seriously.  It is ok for Bleacher Report and Gentleman's Quarterly writer Bethlehem Shoals (whose actual name is  Nathaniel Friedman) to threaten a grieving mother with violence (because he disagreed with her).  But if a conservative offers an opinion that differs with someone else (without any physical threats whatsoever) they get banned from Twitter.  


Reason: Free Speech War with Milo Ban

Wombat: DaTechGuy: Apparently @Twitter @Safety think (certain) women are weak fragile beings

Wombat: American Power Blog: Pat Smith blames Hillary and Obama for the death of her son.

TOM: Legion of the Banned

AoSHQ: Milo banned and Twitter is a lie

EBL: @Nero Fiddles While @Twitter Burns

No comments:

Post a Comment

I welcome all legitimate comments. Keep it civil. Spam will be deleted. Thanks.