 |
| Ouch |
Eastwood was right. So was Breitbart before him. And of course conservatives recognized the same joke too but unlike The New Yorker knew of Obama's weaknesses going way back...
But this just rubs salt into the wounds of certain New Yorker* readers...
Update:
Smitty is on it too!
Did I mention David Brooks is a friggin tool?
Smells Like Victory!
That Eastwood has a way with images, doesn't he?
That will leave a mark... The New Yorker?
* Of all effete east coast publications, The New Yorker occasionally has decent articles, the cartoons are funny, and at least occasionally willing to stick it back to the left (when they pull that pompous stick out of its butt).
Hey, remember this video?
_The New Yorker_--I once got a gift subscription to it while living in Taiwan during the '80's. It was chockablock with articles like "My unbelievably repressive Irish Catholic girlhood", so I thought "Full speed ahead into the year 1968!" and let the subscription lapse.
ReplyDeleteI know exactly what you are talking about! Those are the bad ones.
DeleteBut occasionally they will have a 10,000 word essay on the mechanics of wild fires in Southern California, or some weird story on a guy who wants to build a monument to store nuclear waste out of some super hard Vermont marble that will last 10,000 years (he never got the waste, but ended up putting red fiesta ware in it instead). How do I read this? Visits to doctor's offices waiting to be seen.
And if Obamacare does not go away we will be reading a lot more of The New Yorker, People, and Highlights.
Delete