Interesting. I've been suspect of Tyson since his job on the science channel came about. He seemed to make assertions that are neither scientific nor peer reviewed. Especially on the subject of singularity. He knows better as a physicist than to assert facts not in evidence. Too bad, because he is a highly intelligent man...and now he's this decades Dan Rather. False but accurate, eh?
Interesting. I've been suspect of Tyson since his job on the science channel came about. He seemed to make assertions that are neither scientific nor peer reviewed. Especially on the subject of singularity. He knows better as a physicist than to assert facts not in evidence. Too bad, because he is a highly intelligent man...and now he's this decades Dan Rather. False but accurate, eh?
ReplyDelete