Comments
Left About This Poll
Posted
by john lynch 1 minute ago.
From 174.45.56.x Report Abuse
The cognitive dissonance
ends.
Posted
by Lewis 2 minutes ago.
From 24.96.157.x Report Abuse
Been reading AA for years
and enjoy the diversity of views in the comments.
Posted
by arminius 3 minutes ago.
From 174.97.228.x Report Abuse
Am seriously worried about
this blog suddenly taking the Little Green Footballs route. Maybe turning off
the comments entirely might stave it off. I hope. It seems like her reactions
were getting more extreme as a reflex against other people's reactions, so
maybe a break will be good.
Posted
by Methadras 3 minutes ago.
From 72.192.171.x Report Abuse
Ann, when I said you were
up to something, but I couldn't tell exactly what, I was going on a hunch based
on your posts as of the last couple of weeks. Now that you've pulled comments,
but relegated them to 'team members' so you've basically created your own
selective pool of commentariats. I cannot fathom how this will be productive
when you have your own peanut gallery. Well, it was interesting while it
lasted, but I think whatever it is you have/had in mind will be more of a
detriment to you than you think. Enjoy the echo chamber.
Posted
by Michael 4 minutes ago.
From 24.99.1.x Report Abuse
Oh, well. I have enjoyed
and learned much from many commenters here. There are some very good writers
and thinkers and some very witty characters that i will miss reading and
debating. Others not so much.
Posted
by CF 6 minutes ago.
From 75.164.192.x Report Abuse
Goodness me, what a lot of
nastiness. I must have missed a lot these lovely summer days.
I cannot imagine having
such a public persona as Ms. Althouse, even though I have thoroughly prospered
in it, been informed and engaged by her devotion to post every day, and been
given space to share my own Self.
Thanks, Ann and hubby,
too. Every blessing.
[ you haters will get your
kick in the tender places in the right instant, I feel sure, and/but/so I
through an easy internet bless to you & pray you unclench sometime and see
anew. between now and then, though, ptewy]
• Posted by Mary in reply to CF 1
minutes ago. From
64.134.172.x Report Abuse
oh sweetness
• you missed the best parts where ann was kicking the
tender places in the right instant but the beta boy commenters found it in
themselves to kick her right back...
•
• it was beautiful, like a new era where deference to
the chicks is not automatically assumed.
• Posted by Nichevo in reply to CF 4
minutes ago. From
66.87.117.x Report Abuse
CF, she must like kicks; she asked for them,
she got them. This is what is known as "No More Mr. Nice Guy."
•
• Maybe she shouldn't play tackle football with the
boys.
Posted
by Mary 13 minutes ago.
From 64.134.172.x Report Abuse
turns out... despite the
most recent post, the professor's NOT turning the comments back on to honor
judge posner. it's like -- why write it and post it if you're not allowing open
comments.
anyway, my comment to your
latest post is attached below. hope you lick those wounds -- self inflicted,
imo -- and man up and admit you don't value free speech as much as you like to
pretend.
in the end, you're just a
little girl finding solace in the protection of your online daddies it seems...
Don't dish it until you're ready to taste it and eat it yourself. good advice
for men and women too.
-----------------------
Welcome back to the land of
open discussion. Now, an honest question-- will you still be filtering and
deleting, or will you permit honest disagreement even when you seemingly have
no response to such criticism, and you really want to take your ball and go
home and have a good cry?
Also, can you please
specify the role 'meade' plays in this blog exactly? We've been told he's the
heavy on the delete button, not you, but does he -- and your sons -- comment
under various avatars here, on the 'althouse' performance blog? Is it all you
on display here... except when it's not and other 'althouses' cover for you?
just asking ... please, no more tears today.
• Posted by Nichevo in reply to Mary 6
minutes ago. From
66.87.117.x Report Abuse
Yeah, flaky, I thought she had reconsidered
too. Oopsie. (Guess the condom broke!
•
• The problem is, Professor, that the blog IS the
comments, that you're not that interesting or valuable, certainly not when you
venture outside the law into your own choice of Topicks (God, I wish we had
Archy or the Dead Gentleman or the concrete dog-god back! and that if you had to start from
scratch all over again you couldn't.
•
• So absent comments, people will probably stop in
occasionally for the next few days to see if you've changed your mind...then go
elsewhere. Like I said before, it'll just be you and Inga. Maybe a few others
like the cat lady Victoria. In which case this place will be hell on Blogspot.
•
• Don't worry, Norma, you're still big, it's the
internet that got small...
• Posted by Dante in reply to Mary 6
minutes ago. From
71.116.77.x Report Abuse
Perhaps we could make a blog that links to
Ann's articles, that allow comments on that. Is that legal? I can't imagine why
not. I'll ask meade if he thinks that's OK.
Posted
by Dante 17 minutes ago.
From 71.116.77.x Report Abuse
If someone doesn't like
comments, they don't have to read them. How can anyone be bothered by comments?
Without Freeman, DBQ,
Crack, Bagoh20, ChipAhoy, Synova, edutcher, Methadras, n.n., and many others.,
what's the point? Even Inga has value in bringing out what appears to be
(though I'm not certain), the liberal perspective.
In my view, the value of
this blog has been you open up interesting topics. But when you post on topics
many disagree with you on, such as Gay Marriage, your justification for the
clearly unfair situation with women and children, you become irrational, and
frankly mean. The discussion devolves into ad hominem abuse.
The other topics I find
often have very interesting POVs. Another thought is, why not post on your hot
topic buttons, and let people explore the topics. That was the value to me.
Without it, the blog has much less value.
Posted
by Nichevo 17 minutes ago.
From 66.87.117.x Report Abuse
La la la...Althouse, there
is this thing called intellectual honesty. You should look it up in the
unlinkable OED. I wonder what you have to do to be a "team member."
Agree with Althouse, is my guess. Althouse, we don't hate you, but we do
despise you now. Or, is "contemn" a word, i.e. = "hold in contempt?"
In which case we contemn you. Althouse, when you decide to abort this vanity
project of yours, will you delete all traces of it from Blogspot and the WWW,
or just leave it frozen in amber so we know when you finally lost it? Althouse,
you can't handle the truth. Not on Blogspot you can't. Time for althou.se where
you can seamlessly delete, censor, edit, ban users and their comments with the
fine-grained control of a modern-day Minitrue. I know you're a cheapass but
your ego is worth it, n'est-ce pas? Althouse, apologize and show that you
understand what you did wrong, and maybe we will forgive you and allow you to
make it up to us. Crack will put away the car antenna, won't you, Crack?
Hey...assume it was not a lie...you're not in any danger of losing your job
over this, are you Annie? How sad that would be! Well, there will always be
lots of grandchildren to support you in your old age...oh wait.
La la la...
• Posted by Nichevo in reply to Nichevo 16
minutes ago. From
66.87.117.x Report Abuse
Aplogies for the no paras, but the pollcode
thingy kept telling me I had too many line breaks. Whatevs.
Posted
by Jay 37 minutes ago.
From 173.233.10.x Report Abuse
"had to shut off the
comments" is a ridiculous lie.
Get a grip.
Posted
by Mary 41 minutes ago.
From 64.134.172.x Report Abuse
'This past week it looks
like Ann kind of lost it. I am sure it is a shock to discover that your
audience doesn't hold with some 70's feminist notions. ... But it would be
better to think up some arguments to defend such notions. '
-------------
But...
Hiding behind the delete
button, and self selecting your representative 'female' commenters kinda
ensures that you never grow out of your girlish silliness.
She's talked big cutting
down the men for weeks. When they return the banter in kind, she runs and
hides, letting her husband reign on what he sees fit to stay up, and what he
deletes.
It's a silly game to her,
but at least there's honesty now, in letting blog readers see how filtered all
the discussion in the comments sections here truly is.
In her classrooms too, for
those potentially seeking out uw law for the 'intellectual honesty' and
'diverse opinions' and 'open discussions' she claims to value there.
Insta made her reputation
on these internets. Let's see if, like the husband, he continues to protect her
and still tosses her the occassional bone in the form of a gratuitous link.
Posted
by 24 hours 42 minutes ago.
From 173.48.192.x Report Abuse
Once she sees the traffic
drop I think this temper tantrum will be very short lived.
Posted
by john lynch 42 minutes ago.
From 174.45.56.x Report Abuse
This is frustrating. I
don't even care about any of those posts. I just wanted to go on about Egypt
and the tigers of Sumatra.
Posted
by Mary 47 minutes ago.
From 64.134.172.x Report Abuse
Heh. Free expression is
just wonderful until it isn't, huh?
------
shhhh... he finally got
her to stop crying at the commenter's honesty.
now, as freeman hunt so
lovingly and gently refers -- enjoy. it might take a while for ann to admit
this is a boy's version of taking her ball and going home, after the game got a
bit rough for the girls.
SOME of the girls, I
should add. Plenty of women here understand men beyond their own husbands (if
they have them.
Posted
by Mary 51 minutes ago.
From 64.134.172.x Report Abuse
finally -- to be
substantive--
what if a law professor/
student / commenter opined, like althouse did with the men, that any woman who
knowingly exposes her eggs to sperm and finds herself unexpectedly pregnant
should be mocked like she did the men.
turnabout is fairplay
right.
you don't want to support
a baby for life, and believe like the professor said she does that abortion is
murder, then why not ask why careless women should not be bailed out by
taxpayers for her choice, just like she's arguing men with 'loose splooge' --
ugly language, btw -- should just face up to the life of loserdom they created
for themselves...
do all women need to be
specially protected, like the professor and freeman hunt seem to think?
an awful lot of
independent libertarian women would disagree. it's not hard not to get
pregnant, even when you're sexually very active, but of course, that would be
suggesting that men and women are indeed =, and god knows, we can't have
that...
'protect us-- we're women'
that's why men laugh at
such histronics and pity the current common husband who's presumably being paid
well to perform these type of blog tasks.
Page: 1 2
3
- See more at: http://poll.pollcode.com/owqyt_result_duplicate#sthash.cKMBZMip.dpuf
The Althouse blog with the comments off is... Show
Poll
Showing comments 21-40 of 47.
|
|
Posted by Mary 50 minutes ago.
From 64.134.172.x Report Abuse
Heh. Free expression is just wonderful until it isn't, huh?
------
shhhh... he finally got her to stop crying at the commenter's
honesty.
now, as freeman hunt so lovingly and gently refers -- enjoy. it
might take a while for ann to admit this is a boy's version of taking her ball
and going home, after the game got a bit rough for the girls.
SOME of the girls, I should add. Plenty of women here understand
men beyond their own husbands (if they have them.
Posted by Mary 54 minutes ago.
From 64.134.172.x Report Abuse
finally -- to be substantive--
what if a law professor/ student / commenter opined, like
althouse did with the men, that any woman who knowingly exposes her eggs to
sperm and finds herself unexpectedly pregnant should be mocked like she did the
men.
turnabout is fairplay right.
you don't want to support a baby for life, and believe like the
professor said she does that abortion is murder, then why not ask why careless
women should not be bailed out by taxpayers for her choice, just like she's
arguing men with 'loose splooge' -- ugly language, btw -- should just face up
to the life of loserdom they created for themselves...
do all women need to be specially protected, like the professor
and freeman hunt seem to think?
an awful lot of independent libertarian women would disagree.
it's not hard not to get pregnant, even when you're sexually very active, but
of course, that would be suggesting that men and women are indeed =, and god
knows, we can't have that...
'protect us-- we're women'
that's why men laugh at such histronics and pity the current
common husband who's presumably being paid well to perform these type of blog
tasks.
Posted by Chef Mojo 54 minutes ago.
From 184.5.136.x Report Abuse
Heh. Free expression is just wonderful until it isn't, huh?
Posted by Freeman Hunt 55 minutes ago.
From 98.180.216.x Report Abuse
Suddenly it is clear why the comments are off. Enjoy the break!
Posted by Cheesy 56 minutes ago.
From 24.40.145.x Report Abuse
AA has a small empty brain. Meade likes that in a woman. That's
all he likes in a woman.
Posted by Mary 1 hour ago.
From 64.134.172.x Report Abuse
*I'm not getting into details here to embarrass her... but if
you're considering attending uw law school, be aware --- her committment to
diverse opinions and willingness to respectfully discuss alternate opinions is
not as pretty as it would seem from reading her comments policy.
fwiw...
remember-- there's no husband sitting handy with a delete button
in the classroom, and indeed, stronger students tend to push back there too.
she tends to melt or wither upon decent followup when her
opinions are so silly and do not mesh with reality.
she gets away with it though, because too many law students are
young, dumb and full of 'give the pretty proffy what she wants to hear.'
Posted by Titus 1 hour ago.
From 24.40.145.x Report Abuse
Meade sucks more d ick than Ann does. And he is better at it.
Posted by Colonel Jessup 1 hour
ago.
From 24.103.111.x Report Abuse
YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!!!
Posted by Marshal 1 hour ago.
From 68.50.13.x Report Abuse
"Had to" seems like it needs further explanation.
Posted by JAC 1 hour ago.
From 24.40.145.x Report Abuse
Meade is a p ussy. AA is dead inside. They deserve each other,
in a drunken, dessicated sort of way.
Posted by Rick 1 hour ago.
From 67.170.117.x Report Abuse
I don't comment but I have enjoyed reading the comments. This
past week it looks like Ann kind of lost it. I am sure it is a shock to
discover that your audience doesn't hold with some 70's feminist notions. I am
sorry about that. Hope you recover, Ann. But it would be better to think up
some arguments to defend such notions. I for one would love to hear them since
I always learn from arguments even if only to think up my own responses.
Opposition is true friendship. (William Blake)
Posted by Mary 1 hour ago.
From 64.134.172.x Report Abuse
h, ds, so *that's* why they turned them off!
-----
freeman gets linked only when things get kinda hot here, and
annie needs backup from the conservative/catholic crowd.
remember last week's euphoria over the gay rights thing? now
Ann's all -- the family is the backbone of society...
she and her current husband have at least four between them. Not
counting the families started by their exes.
but you 'beta' men-- watch your sperm...
Posted by Walker 1 hour ago.
From 24.40.145.x Report Abuse
SHAME!!!
Posted by Jay 1 hour ago.
From 173.233.10.x Report Abuse
Hey, lay off meade, he had to show off his beta male bonafides
today.
Posted by baron zemo 1 hour ago.
From 24.103.111.x Report Abuse
Posted by Mary 1 hour ago.
From 64.134.172.x Report Abuse
One of the attractionsof Althouse was it was one of the few
Leftist sites that showed integrity when it came to comments. -
---------
No.
You simply were not aware of how busy meade was kept with that
delete button.
Gave the site an air of open discussion when it all is actually
filtered and you're reading what was allowed to remain standing...
she's an intellectual coward advocating special protections for
women.
she needs to delete when others point this out. worse, she has
her husband doing the deleting so she can claim she's all for being disagreed
with and promoting honest discussion.
nope and nope.
Posted by Nomennovum 1 hour ago.
From 69.117.35.x Report Abuse
I suppose multiple postings of the same comments didn't help
matters either, right?
Posted by Freeman Hunt 1 hour ago.
From 98.180.216.x Report Abuse
Oh, ds, so *that's* why they turned them off!
Posted by Mary 1 hour ago.
From 64.134.172.x Report Abuse
At least it's honest this way.
Either you welcome honest dissent or your husband protects you
by manning the delete button.
You talk big but hide when challenged and others respond in
kind...
I call bull on you, big time.
Posted by gahrie 1 hour ago.
From 71.95.11.x Report Abuse
How terribly Leftist of her. One of the attractionsof Althouse
was it was one of the few Leftist sites that showed integrity when it came to
comments.
Add a Comment
Your Name:
Comment:
Posted by gahrie 1 hour ago.
From 71.95.11.x Report Abuse
How terribly Leftist of her. One of the attractionsof Althouse
was it was one of the few Leftist sites that showed integrity when it came to
comments.
Posted by Nomennovum 1 hour ago.
From 69.117.35.x Report Abuse
I am not one to duck blame. I blame Meade.
Posted by Nomennovum 1 hour ago.
From 69.117.35.x Report Abuse
I am not one to duck blame. I blame Meade.
Posted by fukaa 1 hour ago.
From 24.40.145.x Report Abuse
Althouse is a dried up old who is also an alcoholic. Her need to
control everything reflects poorly on that girly man she married. Meade - get
a grip, you are a douche and your wife is a minimally competent whore.
Posted by Sydney 1 hour ago.
From 99.3.11.x Report Abuse
Too bad. The best part of your blog is your comments section.
Posted by motorave 1 hour ago.
From 24.9.224.x Report Abuse
As an avid lurker I can only guess what the reason is
Posted by ds 1 hour ago.
From 207.38.236.x Report Abuse
wtf this was the first day I commented in about 3 years of
lurking ... what happened?!
Posted by Meade 1 hour ago.
From 99.72.241.x Report Abuse
None of the above but I would've voted for:
"fine, I needed a break" if it had been an option.
Add a Comment
Your Name:
Comment:
|
No comments:
Post a Comment
I welcome all legitimate comments. Keep it civil. Spam will be deleted. Thanks.