Friday, January 31, 2020

Lamar Alexander Says No More Witnesses πŸ‘




Update:  It's a mistake not giving the final kill shot now. I'm guessing if he could--Mitch would do so. 

EBL: Eric Ciaramella and John Roberts: CALL ME BY YOUR NAME πŸ‘¨πŸ»β€βš–οΈπŸ€¦πŸ»β€β™€οΈ,  Good Morning πŸŒ₯οΈβ›…οΈπŸŒ€οΈ,  #QuidProJoe and Hunter Biden: Pam Bondi in the Senate πŸ”₯Coup Cucks Clan πŸ€¦πŸ»β€β™€οΈ,  Obama Administration's Fraudulent FISA Warrants? How is this not a bigger news story? πŸ‘¨β€βš–οΈπŸ€”πŸ€·πŸ»β€β™€οΈ, Tulsi πŸ₯Š vs. Hillary πŸ₯Š , Warren's PlanSchiffty PhotosIt is time for Cocaine Mitch to show us his Senate Kung Fu πŸ₯‹, and Hey, is there something going on with peaches today? πŸ‘πŸ€·πŸ»β€β™€οΈ

Rush Limbaugh: Dems really don't want witnessesDrive-Bys DesperateMini Election Night Media FreaksBolton and the BureaucratsSchiff makes up new stuff, and It's Almost Over: Democrats Know They've Been Beaten Again

Fox News: CNN commentator admits legitimate point to for GOP to question why "whistleblower" (that would be Democrat Operative Eric Ciaramella) has not testified

TOM: Collins Announces β€˜Yes,’ Alexander β€˜No’ on Calling Impeachment Witnesses: TIE?

The Federalist: Top 8 reasons Trump already has won Impeachment

Instapundit: Legal InsurrectionIn Praise of Mitch McConnell

RedState: Interesting issue in Rand Paul's question in Senate

American Spectator: The news "they" won't report

Legal Insurrection: Likely 50-50 on witnesses

No comments:

Post a Comment

I welcome all legitimate comments. Keep it civil. Spam will be deleted. Thanks.